That was a manual car and I was mainly in 1-3 gears through that 4 km stretch. I sometimes barely clocked 400 km on one tank which worked out to about 9 km/L. had to drive through a shortcut (about 4 km) which was a very winding and narrow road through private estate with about 12 speed humps distributed through that stretch. if it's short distance with many traffic lights, you can kiss your fuel consumption goodbye. I don't measure the subsequent ones though, because the next thing I see is how much it gets once it drops to about 1-2 bars.It's the route you drive I think. On a full tank I get about 70-80km in before the first bar drops. I don't think I'm very heavy-footed when driving so I'm not sure what it is. Like I said it's about 1-2 bars left when I'm around the 420km mark. Yeahh, I'd say I'm quite sure because that's what the tripmeter shows. Quite easy to achieve if you just switch it on during peak hour driving where you have no chance to speed. They also have another 15% for actual safe driving tracked by their mobile AIG On The Go mobile app. While I paid about 1.8k for 1st year of my fxt, I was pleasantly surprised that they offered 1.2k+ for the 2nd yr including early bird privilege which I just signed.įor AIG, not sure if you can further add on their 5-10% further discount if you try and pass their safe driver online theory test. tested Q2 1.0 and 1.4 last nite and going back to eurokar for CX5 2.0l if worth 119k basic or 128k premium or just get the mazda 6 at 103k basic and 111k premium.įor insurance, I stayed with AIG for ease mind of repair and claim but yes, not the cheapest but policies varies so much and the shit is in the details. No, I had not ordered and certainly not the impreza regardless a good deal. Sure you can appeal and get legal help but it is a long drawn frustrating affair that individual will find it hard to engage the big boys. they can simply show you the insurance policy that owners signed which acknowledge on "illegal modification to original mfgr specification" and what can be more damning that the fact that subaru japan oreli tells you not to do so and MI refusing to install but owners did so nevertheless ? Leaving for KL for short trip and back to book the mazda6 premium on Sunday afternoon with 99% probability since CO's preference for SUV is partially met by this huge interior space. interior is not like mazda 6 but understandable since CX5 is more utility while Mazda6 really sedan to take of passengers with obvious touches of luxury.ĬX5 is also a bit nosier from the engine being nearer and does not have automated emergency braking even in premium version and kerp for 2.5l version only while mazda6 premium has it.ītw, their safety system is also optical but 1 camera and comes with solar film on windscreen per photo. Just back from eurokar and tested the CX5. Hack the penalty for not taking MI's insurance (partner). In the end, I found an insurer which quoted even much cheaper, which is also giving discount for in-car camera. The quotation I got directly from AIG is hundreds cheaper. I like AIG but the one quoted by MI is just way off. The sales guy is a good person (I refused to go back to the first one who had attended to me just one week prior), except for the wrong advice for the UV. make our life easier), imagine the insurer would have to prove whatever you did is causing the collision. please do so or just be aware.Īs you said, the driver is responsible for safety and Eyesight is there to assist (i.e. just hope bros with eyesight are aware before they install solar film.Īlready checked with MI while insurers will not commit. Indeed may not happen but you will be at the mercy of insurers which I am not prepared to be. and you as owners will have to bear the risk. Or for installing additional wiring in the car, and so on.Hi Reo,Īs mentioned, MI can simply do so if not a concern but they refuse. Dive deeper a good agent will tell you they're referring to the battery warranty in this case. I noted you're not getting Eyesight.Ī little not like-for-like but it's like agent telling us if we change the battery "outside", warranty (for the car) is not covered. Let's not get too hung up with this - to address the concern, best to check with insurer. And for any frontal collision which could be caused by Eyesight, they will have to prove that you've been using Eyesight (the fact that it's there does not mean you have used it), and that the "modification" is hindering it's performance, and that because of the hindrance, it caused the collision. What I meant was they can't blame the "modification" on every collision. Surely they can't just slap that note and discharge their liability - it's just too wide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |